WikiLeaks takes aim at Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury, posts link to manuscript

Radical transparency site WikiLeaks has gone after author Michael Wolff following the publication of a controversial book that puts the Trump White House in an unflattering light.


​The Twitter account for the organisation published the link to the book by the New York-based media critic which has created a firestorm for US President Donald Trump over the past week…

Such moves to undermine the financial viability of the highly anticipated book echo the North Koreans’ hacking of Sony Pictures in 2014, when vast amounts of the company’s intellectual property was posted online in an act of aggression.

Read the full story here.


Freedom of Press Foundation ‘strongly opposes’ any US gov’t persecution of WikiLeaks

…So apparently concludes their December 9 email to radical transparency group Wikileaks.

“We continue to strongly oppose any prosecution attempts by the US government for WikiLeaks’s publishing activities,” according to an email reportedly from FPF director Trevor Timm released by WikiLeaks.

OK. So why pull support for WikiLeaks now?


After helping Wikileaks received funding from Americans for years, what has changed?

Assange in a lengthy letter provides some needed background – and, ahem, transparency – on the history of the organisation, which he says was created by himself and cyberspace-godfather John Perry Barlow to “protect WikiLeaks and its donors from politically induced financial censorship.”

FPF says the reason for dropping WikiLeaks is that “the financial blockade by the major payment processors is no longer in effect.”

Will be interesting to know if there are other reasons. Assange states that he didn’t know of FPF’s plans until a November 2017 Daily Beast story revealed the plan.

One to watch.



US statement on Russian election hacks



This statement from the US intelligence community was published a full month before the 2016 presidential election after some considerable agonizing at the White House. It begins:

The US Intelligence Community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there.

Link here.

Follow Chris Zappone on Facebook



Isn’t Russia’s meddling in the US election a ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor’?

For years, politicians and the public have spoken in ominous terms about a so-called “Cyber Pearl Harbor“, an event in which a foreign power or terrorist group stages a crippling attack on US infrastructure that renders the country incapable of functioning.

In 1996, when Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick began assessing the risks posed by hacking to infrastructure she used the term.

“We have not yet had a terrorist cyber attack on the infrastructure. But I think that that is just a matter of time. We do not want to wait for the cyber equivalent of Pearl Harbor,” she said, as quoted in Fred Kaplan’s new book .

Pearl Harbor attack, 1941

Since 1996 the notion of a Cyber Pearl Harbor has become a political talking point in the US.

I can’t think of a more core piece of infrastructure in the United States of America than its constitutional democracy and the integrity of free and fair elections.

What’s happening in the US election is so surprising – the subversion, the manipulation of perceptions online – that US democracy can’t adequately respond. Even the intelligence community is struggling to wake up to it, after years of focusing on China’s economic cyber hacking. Just recognizing the new battlefield of social cyber space is largely uncontested by the US is a challenge.

So in my opinion, this qualifies as the Cyber Pearl Harbor that was first mentioned 20 years ago by policy analysts in Washington.

And the thing about Pearl Harbor attacks is that you just don’t know where they’re coming from. So while US utilities and airline operators are creating redundancies and more resilient defense against hackers, Guccifer 2.0 has stolen information from the DNC and the US political establishment. That information is passed along to a place like WikiLeaks which can repackage them for an audience on the lookout for the perfidy of power.

That message can be mainlined back to mid-America through syndicated radio (thanks to Sean Hannity) and the next thing you know, you have a data stream of misinformation pumping right into the US electoral progress.

The thing about Pearl Harbors, they tend to come out of nowhere.

The foreign government seeking to do the US harm today has correctly identified the leadership and credibility vacuum on the right side of the US political spectrum. It is skillfully exploiting that reality and the post-financial crisis disenchantment more broadly.

If the information war effort against the US election is like the attack on Pearl Harbor, today would be equivalent to the early hours of December 7th, 1941. The sailors and servicemen at Pearl Harbor are rushing out of their quarters and only struggling to understand who is attacking them and the nature of the hostilities.

The nature of the information war against the US is so radically different from old style war, though, it’s as if the pilots flying the zeros are in many cases Americans themselves, duped into an activity that damages and undermines their own country and interests.

But this, too, is a big part of the new game the American people find themselves forced to play. Will they wake up soon enough to fight back?  The presidential election is on November 8.

Follow Chris on Facebook